Objective
II
II
To ascertain the implication of poor
refuse management to health in Uguno Orogun Community
refuse management to health in Uguno Orogun Community
Step
I: Formulated hypothesis
I: Formulated hypothesis
Ho: There are no implication of poor
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun Community
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun Community
Ha: There are implication of poor
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun
Community
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun
Community
Step
II: Choose alpha (α) and degree of
freedom (d.f)
II: Choose alpha (α) and degree of
freedom (d.f)
df = (R-1) (C-1)
(3-1)
(2-1)
(2-1)
2 x 1
= 2
= 2
df = 2
Where R = Row
C = Column
α = 0.05 = 5.991
S/N |
QUESTION |
YES |
NO |
TOTAL |
4. |
Are there any hazards associated with refuse management? |
252 |
48 |
300 |
5. |
Does poor refuse management result to airborne diseases? |
270 |
30 |
300 |
6. |
Does poor refuse management result to disease transmission? |
259 |
41 |
300 |
TOTAL |
781 |
119 |
900 | |
O |
E |
O – E |
(O – E) |
(O – E)2/E |
252 |
260.3 |
-8.3 |
68.89 |
0.26 |
270 |
260.3 |
97 |
94.09 |
0.36 |
259 |
260.3 |
-1.3 |
1.69 |
6.49 |
48 |
39.7 |
8.3 |
68.89 |
1.74 |
30 |
39.7 |
-9.7 |
94.09 |
2.37 |
41 |
39.7 |
1.3 |
1.69 |
0.04 |
Total |
11.26 | |||
Step VI: Applying
decision rule
decision rule
Since calculated 11.26 is ≥ table value
0.05 at 2df = 5.991, the researcher rejected the null hypothesis (Ho) and concluded
that there are implication of poor refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun
Community.
0.05 at 2df = 5.991, the researcher rejected the null hypothesis (Ho) and concluded
that there are implication of poor refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun
Community.
