In what is becoming one of the most controversial crypto prosecutions in U.S. history, Rowland Marcus Andrade, the founder of AML Bitcoin is fighting back. His legal team has filed a motion for reconsideration, urging the court to reexamine evidence that suggests government misconduct in the investigation and trial. At the heart of the request is a demand to declassify documents that may reveal misconduct by federal agents, particularly those tied to the FBI and the Department of Justice.
According to Andrade’s attorneys, critical information was suppressed—information that could have changed the outcome of the case. Central to the motion are allegations involving FBI agents Roahn Wynar and Ethan Quinn, as well as political consultant Jack Abramoff, who reportedly used AML Bitcoin to fund undisclosed campaigns, including one allegedly targeting Joe Biden during the Trump era.
As outlined in this report on ADVFN, the defense argues that Abramoff ran pro-Russia influence campaigns using proceeds from AML Bitcoin—an allegation that, if proven, could expose a web of political manipulation and selective prosecution.
Suppressed Evidence and the Push for Declassification
New declarations submitted by Andrade’s team reveal that had an evidentiary hearing been allowed, key witnesses could have testified to serious misconduct. For instance, Agent Buma was allegedly prepared to confirm that notes from Abramoff connected AML Bitcoin to politically sensitive funding activities. Another witness, May Edwards, claimed to have witnessed the suppression of evidence related to international money laundering at the U.S. Treasury—specifically naming Landfair Capital, a shell company used by Abramoff.
This isn’t just about one man’s trial. It’s about how the government chose to prosecute, and whether selective enforcement was used to shield certain individuals while targeting others. The motion directly challenges the DOJ’s narrative and seeks to expose internal inconsistencies that may have unfairly tipped the scales of justice.
National Implications: A Crypto Case with Political Ties
The AML Bitcoin case is no longer just a fraud trial—it’s a litmus test for accountability in federal investigations involving cryptocurrency and politics. With Andrade’s legal team now calling for a new trial, citing suppressed evidence and potential agency misconduct, the crypto community and civil rights advocates are rallying behind demands for full transparency.
The defense’s motion points out that classified documents must be unsealed so the public can understand the full scope of what occurred. This aligns with broader calls across the digital asset space for clearer regulations and non-politicized oversight.
The Call to Action
A Change.org petition has been launched demanding the immediate declassification of AML Bitcoin-related documents. Supporters argue that Americans deserve to know whether federal agencies manipulated or withheld evidence to secure a conviction against Andrade—especially in a case that intersects with powerful political figures and global financial interests.
As media attention grows, more readers are directed to high-profile articles already ranking on Google News, including those by AML Intelligence and the DOJ’s public statements. Linking new articles like this one to those established sources will aid in indexing and visibility, as your team continues to push this story into the national spotlight.
Conclusion
The case against Marcus Andrade and AML Bitcoin is not just a courtroom drama—it’s a turning point for transparency in the digital currency age. With federal agents, crypto pioneers, and political operatives all named in the emerging evidence, the demand for an unbiased review and full declassification of documents is louder than ever.
For updates and key filings in this case, explore the DOJ archive and track developments through news sources already indexed on Google.