The Role of Neuroanatomy in Understanding Neurological Disorder

Abstract

Neuroanatomy, is an extraordinary branch of anatomy that deals with focusing on the structure of the nervous system, it also contributes in a crucial role in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of neurological disorders. As we know it in society neurological conditions progressively rise nationwide, with increasing prevalence in both younger and aging populations, the need for crucial anatomical understanding has been more important. Disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy, alongside multiple sclerosis and strokes are developed from degenerative changes or disruption of particular neural circuits and brain regions.

 A strong knowledge of neuroanatomical structures, such as the basal ganglia, cortex, spinal cord, cerebellum and peripheral nerves, will fully help provide researchers and clinicians with the equipment’s to interpret symptoms, localize damage, and lastly create effective treatment strategies.

More to it, emerging technologies and neuro-imaging in neuroscience depends strictly on anatomical understanding to strengthen the knowledge of diagnostic accuracy precision and tailor individualized therapies. Further explanations about this topic will unfold throughout this article because we will explore the diverse applications of neuroanatomy in research and clinical work. The subject provides essential understanding for diagnosing and treating diverse neurological conditions. The essential role of neuroanatomy in neuroscience advancement between fundamental science and technology will continue leading to better neurology outcomes and patient care treatments.

Introduction:

Neuroanatomy as we know it, is explains the structure and organization of the whole nervous system, the advancement of this study has been an everchanging over these recent years, this article dives in depth into the latest research work findings in neuroanatomy, spotting key findings that have reshaped our very own knowledge of the intricate networks in the brain.

Advanced technology together with team-based research has driven neuroanatomy knowledge and research study into a modern renaissance. With various tool techniques ranging from high frame resolution imaging to high tech molecular biology tools, expert researchers have created significant efforts in taking care of the complexity of the nervous system. This article will shed a brighter light on the updated advancements in neuroanatomy, emphasizing their routes for having a full understanding of the brain, its functions and addressing the clinical neurological disorders.

The mapping of neuronal circuits and the clarification of their roles in functionality are crucial topics in our recent neuroanatomy research. The insights from neurodevelopmental problems to neurodegenerative disease and the information gotten from neuroanatomy research have the potential to help treat a wide range of neurological ailments.

By encoding the anatomical substrates of neurological dysfunctions, this is going to be a huge move for everyone, researchers plan on developing targeted therapies and plannings on mitigating symptoms and improving patient outcomes.

 Additionally, the integration of neuroanatomical understanding with various fields, such as computational neuroscience and genetics, gives thrilling avenues for unwrapping the complexities of the brain, its functions and dysfunctions.

In conclusion to it all, the research field of neuroanatomy benefits from scientific discoveries marked by modern technological progress and teamwork between different scientific disciplines.

The recent research finding has given unprecedented look through into the organization, nervous system functions, and plasticity, with recent implications for neuroscience and its clinical practice. As we much more than a step, we progress in the continuation on unraveling the hidden mysteries of the brain, its interdisciplinary walk through and translational research will be gratefully instrumental in harnessing the complete potential of neuroanatomy in addressing the major challenges of its neurological disorders and strengthen human health and wellbeing.

Historical Context and Evolution

The field of Neuroanatomy exists since ancient times following the work of Hippocrates and Galen as described in Smith and Nichols (2018). During the Renaissance period with Andreas Vesalius at its forefront scientists established neuroanatomy as an independent field of science [Finger (2001); Dziedzic et al. (2024)]. Shepherd (1991) noted that the 17th-century microscopical innovation enabled advanced brain tissue studies which discovered nerve cells along with the development of the neuron doctrine during the late 1800s by Santiago Ramón y Cajal.

The development of modern brain knowledge about structure and organization relies on these extensive historical developments [Dziedzic, 2024; Gazzaniga, Ivry, & Mangun, 2018; Gazzaniga, Ivry, & Mangun, 2018; Purves et al., 2018]. Peters, Palay, and Webster (1991) described the scientific developments of the 19th and 20th centuries that led to the creation of histological staining methods including Golgi stain which allowed researchers to see single neurons and their connecting structures.

Electron microscopy introduced ultratheoretical details about neuronal elements in the second part of the century while novel imaging strategies including computed tomography with CT and magnetic resonance imaging with MRI enabled visualizing brain structures directly from living subjects [Hounsfield & Radiol, 1997; Lauterbur, 1973].

Overview of Neurological Disorders

As we know it, it has been on a recent showcasing on how neurological disorder has been on a rise mostly at the sub-Saharan African region. The major factors that are creating this kind of increased burden include malaria, malnutrition, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), adverse perinatal conditions, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and also other causes of meningitis and encephalitis, demographic transitions, persistent regional developmental disorders and increased vehicular traffics. Bring to a point that leads neurological disorders which include; mental retardation, cerebral palsy, and other developmental disorders, stroke, peripheral neuropathy and epilepsy, and increasingly, the nervous system complication of trauma, HIV/AIDS, and alcohol abuse. The poor rather than harmful nature of various neurological disorders, the stigmatize which is attached to it with brain disorders, and the large difficulty in collecting epidemiologic information have resulted in their being underreported and neglected in the Sub-Saharan African regions. The king off neglect showcases an unfortunate paradox, since neurological disorders (and psychiatric) run up to at most 25 % of the world burden of disease and are also responsible for an even larger view of people living with disability.

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO, 2020), neurological disorders are any diseases affecting the entirety of the nervous system. These are conditions affecting the Central Nervous System’s (CNS) neurons or tracts in the Spinal Cord or in the whole brain or one of its constituents e.g. Cerebrum (Cortex), Basal Ganglia, Diencephalon, Brain stem (Midbrain, Pons and Medulla Oblongata), Cerebellum. In addition to conditions affecting the Peripheral Nervous System involving Cranial nerves or their nuclei, Spinal plexuses, peripheral nerves, nerve roots, autonomic nervous system, neuromuscular junction and muscles, which all were clarified by World Health Organisation (2020).  

Among the hundreds of specific disorders, some common and some uncommon, many are potentially preventable or treatable. For example, most developmental disorders and many strokes are preventable. Epilepsy, a common problem, is potentially treatable with currently available low-cost medications. Disorders such as HIV/AIDS and the dementia that often accompanies HIV infection are currently untreatable, but their prevalence can be drastically reduced with antiretroviral therapy intervention (Sacktor, 2002). Although few epidemiological studies have been carried out in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is clear that some disorders of the nervous system are more prevalent in this World Bank region than elsewhere in the world. Examples of such overrepresentation include epilepsy, stroke in younger individuals, and neurological complications related to HIV infection.

Cultural and religious issues and beliefs are important in Sub-Saharan Africa. They influence the value placed by society on neurological health, the presentation of symptoms, illness behavior, access to services, pathways through care, the way individuals and families manage illness, the way the community responds to illness, the degree of acceptance and support—and stigma and discrimination—experienced by the person with neurological illness. Because of this, cultural and other contextual factors are important considerations in developing locally appropriate health care policies, programs, and services.

The health burden from neurological disorders presents itself globally as an extensive problem. Neurological disorders comprising Alzheimer’s disease alongside other dementias and Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis cases alongside epilepsy and migraine and tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache constitute 3 percent of global disease burden according to Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study findings. The collective DALYs from dementia with other dementias and epilepsy along with migraine and stroke place them among the fifty highest causes worldwide (Murray et al., 2012).

Research by Murray et al. (2012) demonstrates that Migraine and epilepsy jointly account for one-third of neurological burden with dementia and Parkinson’s disease ranking among the 15 diseases generating maximum burden increase since the last decade. The neurological conditions comprised 5.5 percent of disability affected years (YLDs) in 2010 totaling 42.9 million YLDs while migraine and epilepsy ranked within the 25 leading YLD causes together with dementia. Migraine takes first place among neurological disorders because it accounts for more than 50 percent of neurological YLDs which comprise 2.9 percent of global YLDs; epilepsy contributes to 1.1 percent of worldwide YLDs (Vos et al., 2012). The epidemiological data shows that neurological diseases will multiply rapidly in low- and middle-income countries during the upcoming decade (Murray et al., 2012).

The epidemiological information about neurological disorders including distribution patterns and risk and outcome connections remains insufficient especially for the developing nations. People who have neurological disorders require important social along with economic backing because their physical disabilities combine with cognitive challenges and psychosocial distress (WHO, 2006). The scarcity of resources available to people with disabilities continues to be a significant problem particularly in the context of third world nations despite their common occurrence (WHO, 2004). Research about the cost-benefit ratios of neurological care improvement strategies remains insufficiently examined.

Global Burden of Neurological Disorders

In 2019 globally, approximately 10 million deaths and 349 million DALYs were due to neurological disorders.

• Stroke is the largest contributor to DALYs and deaths with neonatal encephalopathy due to birth asphyxia and trauma being the second largest contributor.
• From 1999-2019, the DALYs of neurological diseases belonging to dementias and Parkinson’s disease showed a large increase while communicable, maternal, neonatal and nutritional categories experienced a sharp decrease (Ding et al., 2022).

Foundations of Neuroanatomy

Finger (2001) brought out a full fact on how nervous system is broadly divided into two major parts:

1. Central Nervous System (CNS)

The CNS acts as the control center of the body. It includes:

• The brain
• The spinal cord

Together, these structures are responsible for:

• Processing sensory input
• Generating thoughts and emotions
• Controlling motor function
• Coordinating responses to internal and external stimuli

The CNS is protected by bone (skull and vertebral column), meninges, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Functions of the CNS:

• Integration: It captures and processes data from the body and environment.
• Decision-making: It generates commands for response.
• Coordination: It manages both voluntary and involuntary activities.

2. Peripheral Nervous System (PNS)

The PNS connects the CNS to the rest of the body (Cleveland Clinic, 2022). It includes:

• Cranial nerves (12 pairs) – emerging from the brain
• Spinal nerves (31 pairs) – emerging from the spinal cord
• Peripheral nerves – extending to limbs, organs, and skin

The PNS is further divided into:

• Somatic Nervous System – controls voluntary muscle movements and conveys sensory information.
• Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) – controls involuntary functions like heart rate, digestion, and breathing.
  • ANS has two parts:
    • Sympathetic: “Fight or flight” response
    • Parasympathetic: “Rest and digest” functions

Functions of the PNS:

• Communication: Carries messages between the body and the CNS.
• Sensation: Delivers sensory data from the skin, muscles, and organs.
• Motor control: Sends movement commands to muscles.

Feature	Central Nervous System (CNS)	Peripheral Nervous System (PNS)
Location	spinal cord and Brain	Nerves outside the CNS
Function	coordinates and Processes information	Connects CNS to limbs and organs
Protection	Enclosed by bone and CSF	Not enclosed by bone; more prone to injury
Regeneration	Limited capacity to heal	Greater ability to regenerate (also in axons)

Key Differences Between CNS and PNS

Major brain regions and their functions:

• Cerebral cortex:

1. Frontal
2. Parietal
3. Temporal
4. occipital lobes

Cerebral Cortex

Shipp (2007) explained on the cerebral cortex being the outermost layer that surrounds the brain. It is composed of gray matter and filled with billions of neurons to conduct high-level executive functions. The cortex divides into 4 lobes: frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal, by different sulci.

As we have an understanding of the cerebral cortex which by for it occupies the greatest surface area of the human brain and also presents its major striking aspect. Also, its majorly known as the neocortex, this has been the most recent evolved area of the brain. To be in fact, the large expansion in the area of the cerebral cortex is mainly hypothesized to have started only some million years ago, in the recent members of the genus Homo; the results of recent is a brain weighing, estimated to be three more times than we would be expected for a mammal our size. Because it envelops the surface of the cerebral hemispheres similarly to a tree’s bark, the cortex gets its name from this similarity.  As also growth spurt in the fourth and also the fifth months of embryonic development, when the gray matter of the brain cortex is significantly increasing as its cell grow in size, is the cause of its wrinkled convoluted image. The white matter also helps, meanwhile, it grows les fast; as a known result, the brain goes into its dense folds and its fissures characteristics of an item with high surface area covered into a small space.

Although this kind of folds in the cerebral cortex shows on point to be random, they also have a lot of prominent gyri or bulges, and sulci or grooves, which acts as pin points in what is in fact a major ordered structure (the finer information of which are still not fully known). The deepest groove which lengthens from the front to end at the back of the head, separating the brain into the right and left hemispheres. the central sulcus in the brain, running from the middle of the brain outwards to both of the hemispheres, and the lateral sulcus, another left to right groove also, in such lower on the hemisphere and goes towards the back of the head, which divides each hemisphere in to four temporal and parietal and occipital. Additionally, there is also a fifth lobe, known as the insula, which is found at the deep part of the brain within the temporal and parietal lobes, and is not apparent as a separated structure on the outer most surface of the cerebral hemispheres.

• The frontal lobe conducts motor operations while handling language functions and executing cognitive abilities including executive function together with attention function and memory processing along with affect management and mood control and personality development and self-awareness and social and moral reasoning abilities (Chayer, & Freedman, 2001). The Broca area exists in the left frontal lobe where it manages speech generation and pronunciation processes.
• The parietal lobe functions as the main processor which interprets hearing together with vision as well as motor control and sensory data and memory information. The Wernicke area which understands spoken and written language exists within the left temporal lobe.
• The temporal lobe supports brain social functions because it handles sensory data to keep memories along with language and emotional experiences (García-Peñas, 2009). The temporal lobe takes on multiple functions by involving itself with hearing processes and spatial recognition and visual data interpretation.
• The visual cortex exists in the occipital lobe which serves to interpret visual signals. See Figure. Areas of localization, Lateral Surface of Hemisphere.

Basal Nuclei

The basal nuclei explained by Lanciego, Luquin and Obeso (2012), also known as basal ganglia, are located deep within the cerebral white matter and comprise the caudate nucleus, putamen, and globus pallidus. These structures form the pallidum and striatum. The basal ganglia are responsible for muscle movements and coordination.

Limbic System

The limbic system comprises the piriform cortex, hippocampus, septal nuclei, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus, and anterior nuclei of the thalamus. Rajmohan and Mohandas (2007) explains further; on the fornix and fiber tracts connect the limbic system parts, allowing them to control emotion, memory, and motivation. The piriform cortex is part of the olfactory system and is in the cortical area of the limbic system. The hypothalamus receives most of the limbic output, which explains psychosomatic illnesses, where emotional stressors cause somatic symptoms. For example, a patient who is currently having financial struggles might present to his primary care physician with hypertension and tachycardia. The septal nuclei, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens are found in the subcortical areas and are responsible for pleasure, emotional processing, and addiction, respectively.

Cerebellum

Movement coordination functions within the cerebellum while sensory signals from brain and spinal cord help it maintain accurate and precise motor activity. The brain region known as the cerebellum assists in numerous cognitive operations together with attention development and language comprehension as well as pleasure response and fear memory (Jimsheleishvili, Dididze & StatPearls, 2023).

Brainstem

Angeles Fernández-Gil et al., (2010) describes the brainstem as a pathway which unites the cerebrum and cerebellum with the spinal cord according to their research (see Image. Pathways From the Brain to the Spinal Cord). Pathways From the Brain to the Spinal Cord). The brainstem shelters critical centers which control automatic functions including breathing, temperature maintenance, respiratory activities, heart rate control, wake-sleep cycles and coughing, sneezing, digestion, vomiting and swallowing. The brainstem includes both grey matter tissues together with white matter tissues. The cerebral cortex connects through white matter fiber tracts to perform voluntary movements and the peripheral nerves use these tracts to send somatosensory information to the high brain regions.

• Spinal Cord Organization

Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013) further talks about the spinal cord being a cylindrical, well-organized structure. It begins at the foramen magnum as a continuation of the medulla oblongata at the base of the skull. It is located within the vertebral or spinal canal. In men, it extends up to 45 cm, and in women, up to 43 cm. The spinal cord divides into 31 segments: cervical 8, thoracic 12, lumbar 5, sacral 5, and coccygeal 1. These segments consist of 31 pairs of spinal nerves with their respective spinal root ganglia. Spinal nerves contain the motor, sensory, and autonomic fibers. These nerves exit through the intervertebral foramen.

The vertebral column comprises seven cervical, twelve thoracic, and five lumbar segments. In adults, the cord terminates at the level of L1 to L2. Thus, the cord spans within 20 bony vertebrae. In a child, it terminates at the upper border of L3. Each of these segments innervates a dermatome. The spinal cord consists of both white matter and gray matter. The white matter becomes sparse towards the end, and the gray matter converges to form the conus medullaris. The cord is anchored at the caudal end to the coccyx by the filum terminal, an extension of the pia mater. The spinal nerves L2 to S1 comprise the cauda equina within the subarachnoid space called the lumbar cistern. The spinal cord has two significant enlargements at the cervical and lumbar regions for brachial and lumbosacral plexus. In the thoracic region, the width of the spinal cord ranges between 0.64 to 0.83 cm, and in the cervical and lumbar regions, it ranges between 1.27 to 1.33 cm. The segment at C5 has the largest transverse diameter with 13.3 +/- 2.2 mm, which decreases to 8.3 +/- 2.1 mm at T8 and increases to 9.4 +/- 1.5 mm at L3. There is less variation in the anteroposterior diameter. (Frostell et al., 2016), (Diaz, & Morales), (Adigun, Reddy, Varacallo & StatPearls, 2023)

Cranial and Spinal Nerves

Cranial Nerves (Table 13.3)
Mnemonic	#	Name	Function (S/M/B)	Central connection (nuclei)	Peripheral connection (ganglion or muscle)
On	I	Olfactory	Smell (S)	Olfactory bulb	Olfactory epithelium
Old	II	Optic	Vision (S)	Hypothalamus/thalamus/midbrain	Retina (retinal ganglion cells)
Olympus’	III	Oculomotor	Eye movements (M)	Oculomotor nucleus	Extraocular muscles (other 4), levator palpebrae superioris, ciliary ganglion (autonomic)
Towering	IV	Trochlear	Eye movements (M)	Trochlear nucleus	Superior oblique muscle
Tops	V	Trigeminal	Sensory/motor – face (B)	Trigeminal nuclei in the midbrain, pons, and medulla	Trigeminal
A	VI	Abducens	Eye movements (M)	Abducens nucleus	Lateral rectus muscle
Finn	VII	Facial	Motor – face, Taste (B)	Facial nucleus, solitary nucleus, superior salivatory nucleus	Facial muscles, Geniculate ganglion, Pterygopalatine ganglion (autonomic)
And	VIII	Auditory (Vestibulocochlear)	Hearing/balance (S)	Cochlear nucleus, Vestibular nucleus/cerebellum	Spiral ganglion (hearing), Vestibular ganglion (balance)
German	IX	Glossopharyngeal	Motor – throat Taste (B)	Solitary nucleus, inferior salivatory nucleus, nucleus ambiguus	Pharyngeal muscles, Geniculate ganglion, Otic ganglion (autonomic)
Viewed	X	Vagus	Motor/sensory – viscera (autonomic) (B)	Medulla	Terminal ganglia serving thoracic and upper abdominal organs (heart and small intestines)
Some	XI	Spinal Accessory	Motor – head and neck (M)	Spinal accessory nucleus	Neck muscles
Hops	XII	Hypoglossal	Motor – lower throat (M)	Hypoglossal nucleus	Muscles of the larynx and lower pharynx

More Knowledge Of the Spinal Nerves

The spinal nerves produce two nerve sets from the spinal cord while maintaining sensory and motor fibers which enable CNS-periphery signal exchange. These combined nerve structures enable transmission between spinal cord signals and all bodily regions through their sensory and motor together with autonomic connections. The anatomical arrangement groups 31 pairs of spinal nerves according to the specific spinal regions. As they leave the spinal cord the nervous system produces eight cervical (C1-C8), twelve thoracic (T1-T12), five lumbar (L1-L5), 5 sacral (S1-S5), and a single coccygeal nerve pair. Nerves that branch directly from the spinal cord and central nervous system belong to the peripheral nervous system whereas spinal nerves fall into this category.

Structure and Function

Spinal nerves serve as mixed nerves which directly process motor and sensory information through the spinal cord from the peripheral body structures. Each nerve develops from posterior (dorsal) and anterior (ventral) spinal cord roots which extend their nerve fibers called fila radicularia. The roots connect via interneurons. The fibers of the spinal nerve roots combine their connections through the intervertebral foramina to develop one spinal nerve.

Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013) explained on how the dorsal root is composed of afferent sensory axons that transmit visceral and somatic sensory information from peripheral receptors back to the central nervous system.  Areas of cutaneous sensory innervation by specific spinal nerves are mappable in an organized fashion in regions across the body known as dermatomes.  While the dorsal root is synapses at the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, the sensory cell bodies of these pseudounipolar neurons are in the dorsal root ganglion, an oval enlargement just outside the cord.  To communicate with the effector division of the spinal nerve, the dorsal root will synapse on an interneuron in the cord’s gray matter as part of the motor reflex arc.  However, fibers of the dorsal root may instead ascend through multiple pathways in the spinal cord to provide sensory information to the thalamus, this all was also clarified by Leijnse & D’Herde (2016)

Meanwhile, the ventral (anterior) root bundle is responsible for transmitting somatic motor output from the brain and spinal cord to the body’s skeletal muscles. Cell bodies of the efferent motor fibers get housed in the anterior horn of the spinal cord, specifically the anterior and lateral gray columns, explained by Bican, Minagar & Pruitt (2013).

Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013) made statement on how all the muscles innervated by a particular spinal nerve are known as the nerve’s myotome.  There are robust enlargements of the cord at the cranial and lumbosacral regions as these areas are responsible for a significant degree of skeletal muscle innervation of the upper and lower extremities, respectively, which was back up by Catala and Kubis (2013), and Johnson, Vekris, Demesticha and Soucacos(2010).

The ventral root is composed of both alpha and gamma motor neuron axons, which supply extrafusal and intrafusal striated muscle, respectively.

The spinal nerve exits the vertebral canal through the intervertebral foramina as a single fascicle of mixed nerve fibers.  The only exception to this rule is at the C1 spinal level, where the C1 spinal nerve exits the column between the occiput and the atlas (C1).  Because the spinal cord does not track the entire length of the vertebral column, spinal nerves in the more cranial regions exit the spinal cord horizontally before directly passing into the periphery.  Meanwhile, spinal nerves caudal to the terminus of the spinal cord (typically at the L1 or L2 vertebral level) must travel inferiorly in the column before exiting.  These rootlets are seen anatomically without the spinal cord and are called the cauda equina. Tracking inferiorly from C1, all spinal nerves above C7 exit the vertebral column above their associated vertebrae.  Spinal nerve C8 exits the intervertebral foramina between C7 and T1.  All remaining spinal nerves depart the vertebra column caudally to their respective vertebrae. [Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013); Saito et al., (2013)]

After exiting the vertebral column, the bundled spinal nerve divides into ventral and dorsal rami.  Both rami contain mixed fibers that provide both sensory and motor innervation. The dorsal ramus is typically smaller than its ventral counterpart and consists of a medial and a lateral branch; however, some literature may also refer to a third, intermediate branch [Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013); Namba (2016)].

The branches of the dorsal rami are responsible for innervating paraspinous muscles (the nerve’s myotome) and regions of skin (the nerve’s dermatome) related to the ramus’ vertebral level.  Responsibility of the lateral and medial branches of dorsal rami in thoracic spinal nerves varies based on vertebral level.  Superior to T6, the medial branch provides muscular and cutaneous innervation, and the lateral branch solely provides solely muscular innervation.  The opposite is true for these branches caudally to T6.  Meanwhile, ventral rami are much more robust in size and function in comparison to their dorsal counterpart.  The ventral rami provide the spinal contributions to all major neural plexuses.  As such, they are responsible for the majority of the body’s sensorimotor innervation clarified by Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013)  and Namba (2016).

Also, Bican, Minagar and Pruitt (2013) made statement of note, preganglionic cells within the autonomic nervous system (ANS) are closely associated with the sensorimotor outflow tracts of spinal nerves. The goal of the ANS is to control visceral motor tone involuntarily.  Autonomic central neuronal bodies originate in the regions of the cord’s lateral horn of the cord’s gray matter, specifically in the intermediolateral nucleus.  In the thoracic and upper lumbar regions (T1 to L2), these neurons give rise to preganglionic sympathetic axons that exit with somatic motor axons through the spinal cord’s ventral (anterior) root. The preganglionic fibers travel within white rami communicantes to paravertebral ganglia within the sympathetic trunk.  From the ganglia, the sympathetic tone can undergo modulation in smooth and cardiac muscle, glands, and immune system cells via a series of gray rami communicantes and postganglionic fibers, which was also clarified by Catala and Kubis (2013).

In the parasympathetic portion of the ANS, preganglionic cells originate in the craniosacral system. Included in this system are cranial nerves III, VII, IX, and X, as well as S2 to S4 of the sacral spinal cord.  The preganglionic fibers of the parasympathetic system are much longer than their sympathetic counterparts.  Rather than terminating abruptly at paravertebral ganglion, parasympathetic preganglionic nerves carry impulses to peripherally located visceral ganglia that are anatomically associated with the nerve’s target tissue (Catala & Kubis 2013).

Neuroanatomical pathways

• Motor
•  Sensory
• associative

The Neuroanatomical Basis of Major Neurological Disorders

Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer disease is a common type of dementia in which one’s brain cells and neural connections begin to degenerate and die. This condition presents with loss of memory and cognitive decline. Alzheimer’s is progressive, with symptoms worsening over time (Schachter & Davis, 2000) Scientists have found aggregations of beta-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles made of tau within the neurons in Alzheimer disease patients. These plaques and tangles result in the death of brain cells and form because of the misfolding of proteins within them. Alzheimer disease patients have decreased neural activity in the parietal cortex, hippocampus, and basal forebrain.

Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson disease is a nervous system disorder that results in the deterioration of dopamine-releasing neurons in the substantia nigra. DeMaagd, and Philip (2015) explains more on the drop in dopamine levels creates tremors, unsteady movements, and loss of balance. Parkinson’s disease is progressive as it usually starts as a tremor in one hand. Many patients exhibit a pill-rolling movement in their hand, bradykinesia, stiffness, and a mask life face as symptoms progress. A Parkinson’s disease diagnosis results from looking at the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and a neurological and physical exam. While no cure exists for the disease, the severity of the symptoms can be controlled. Levodopa can pass through the blood-brain and undergo conversion into dopamine for CNS use. Deep brain stimulation is a surgical option that can stop abnormal brain activity and thus control the tremors. However, deep brain stimulation does not keep the disease from progressing.

Huntington’s disease

Huntington’s disease is an autosomal dominant progressive neurodegenerative disorder (Ross and Tabrizi, 2011) that affects the brain, primarily the basal ganglia where there is extensive atrophy of the caudate, globus pallidus and putamen, with consequent changes in motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning (Grove et al., 2003). The disease also affects the thalamus (particularly the ventrolateral nucleus), a region considered to play a role in sensory perception (Ro et al., 2007). The basal ganglia are involved in both acute and chronic pain processing (Borsook Upadhyay, Chudler & Becerra, 2010) and have a prominent role in sensorimotor integration, which is altered in Huntington’s disease, in which these regions may actually become deafferented (Abbruzzese & Berardelli, 2003). Basal ganglia activations are common in functional imaging studies of pain (Borsook et al., 2010), thus it would not be surprising if the compromised function of the basal ganglia in Huntington’s disease led to alterations in pain processing.

Abnormal cortical and subcortical activation in patients with Huntington’s disease following passive sensory stimulation as evaluated by functional PET studies (Boecker et al., 1999). Although there are no published studies of pain processing in Huntington’s disease, it is known that experimental lesions of the caudate impair pain avoidance, indicating impaired pain processing (Koyama, Kato & Mikami, 2000).

Multiple Sclerosis

Chronic pain is experienced in 40–75% of patients with multiple sclerosis [Kenner, Menon, and Elliott, 2007; Bermejo, Oreja-Guevara, and Diez-Tejedor, 2010; Solaro and Messmer Uccelli, 2010). Multiple sclerosis, an inflammatory, demyelinating autoimmune disease of the CNS, has been associated with multiple pain syndromes including extremity pain, trigeminal neuralgia, Lhermitte’s sign, painful tonic spasms, back pain and headache (O’Connor et al., 2008). While it seems as though the presentation of pain should be correlated with sites of demyelination, a study evaluating CNS pathways in patients with multiple sclerosis with and without pain found no association between chronic pain and the site of demyelination. Increased pain in multiple sclerosis correlates with depression, spinal cord involvement at the onset and the presence of spinal cord lesions (Grau-Lopez, Sierra, Martinez-Caceres, & Ramo-Tello, 2011). Thus, the aetiology of pain may involve a more complex phenomenon including local cytokine processes or alterations in white and grey matter integrity of networks that produce pain.

Metabolic diseases

Fabry’s disease and pain

Fabry’s disease explained by Albano et al., 2010 is an X-linked recessive lysosomal disease caused by α-galactosidase A deficiency. Although Fabry’s disease-related pain syndromes include migraine, distal limb pain is a common presenting feature (Pagnini et al., 2011) and is the most common feature in childhood. An important observation is that the gender effect on pain prevalence in Fabry’s disease is opposite to that in most kinds of pain: pain is more prevalent in males (80%) than females (65%) with Fabry’s disease, although it interfered more with daily activities in females (Hoffmann et al., 2007). In adults, Fabry’s disease-associated alterations in brain structure are well established (Nill et al., 2006), including cerebrovascular events relating to accumulation of lysosomes in several tissues, particularly vascular endothelium and smooth muscle cells (Fellgiebel, Muller, & Ginsberg, 2006).

These vascular events primarily affect the posterior circulation, resulting in damage to periventricular white matter, brainstem, cerebellum, and basal ganglia in particular (Clavelou et al., 2006). In addition, T₁-weighted MRI studies have identified pulvinar calcification in particular as a structure with abnormalities in Fabry’s disease (Moore, Ye F, Schiffmann, & Butman, 2003).

Tumors and pain

Neurofibromatosis

Lu-Emerson and Plotkin, 2009 defines neurofibromatosis as a autosomal dominant neurocutaneous disorder subdivided into neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis. NF1 is the most common neurogenetic disorder (Lu-Emerson and Plotkin, 2009) where the most common lesion is a benign tumour—the neurofibroma. NF1 tumours may develop anywhere in the nervous system including the skin and PNS and usually produce ‘unmanageable pain’ (Huson et al., 2011). NF2 tumours occur in the CNS, including bilateral vestibular schwannomas and meningiomas. Schwannomatosis is characterized by multiple non-vestibular, non-intradermal schwannomas and chronic pain. Pain is the most common presenting feature of schwannnomatosis (MacCollin et al., 2005) and paediatric plexiform (51%) neurofibromas (Serletis et al., 2007). There is an increased incidence of itch in NF1, which may be related to increases in mast cells in the skin (Nurnberger and Moll, 1994).

Common sites for neurofibromatosis-related tumours include intraspinal, paraspinal, brachial plexus, femoral nerve and sciatic nerve. Pain may become manifest as a result of compression (e.g. with foraminal tumours). These tumours are distinct from benign schwannomas, which are common tumours of peripheral and cranial nerves, also presenting with pain, neurological deficits and enlargement of a pre-existing peripheral nerve sheath tumour in NF1 (Valeyrie-Allanore et al., 2005).

These tumours illustrate two processes involved in pain:

 (i) compressive neuropathy (Corey, 2006), where there is nerve sheath involvement (Wang, Nicol, Clapp & Hingtgen, 2005); and (ii) the contribution of inflammatory mediators (through mast cells) to pain (Staser, Yang, & Clapp., 2010). In neurofibromatosis-1, these inflammatory mediators induce vascular changes that may lead to vasculo-occlusive disease (Lasater et al., 2010), producing microinfarcts in the vasa vasorum that may contribute to painful symptoms.

Strokes can occur in different ways. The most common type of stroke, an ischemic stroke, is caused when a blood clot travels to the brain, interrupting blood flow and depriving the brain of oxygen. Hemorrhagic strokes are less common and occur when a blood vessel ruptures, causing bleeding in the brain (American Stroke Association on Stroke, 2024). In the aftermath of a stroke, many patients undergo physical, occupational, and speech therapy to restore function. In general, the sooner a stroke is recognized and treated, the better the prognosis.

There are many different types of stroke. Types of stroke are described by two main criteria—their location and by the cause of tissue damage in the brain.

Ischemic

A stroke caused by a blood clot is called an ischemic stroke due to the lack of blood supply, and thus oxygen and vital nutrients, to a region of brain tissue. An ischemic stroke may be caused by an embolus, often a blood clot, traveling from another part of the body. However, an embolus may also consist of a fat globule or air bubble.

It may also be caused by a thrombus, usually as a result of cerebrovascular disease. Or, it may be the result of vasospasm, the sudden severe narrowing of a blood vessel in the brain (American Stroke Association on Stroke, 2024).

Hemorrhagic

Bleeding of a blood vessel in the brain causes a hemorrhagic stroke. This often happens when arteries in the brain stiffen and break with high blood pressure.⁴

Sometimes the rupture of a brain aneurysm causes bleeding. Extreme changes in blood pressure may trigger the rupture of a brain aneurysm. Sometimes a region of the brain that has been damaged by ischemia can bleed within the first few days after a stroke, causing a secondary hemorrhage.

It is well-documented that strokes affecting the CNS, particularly the structures along the spino-thalamocortico-tract (spinothalamic tract, lateral thalamus, thalamic–parietal projections), produce central pain syndromes (central post-stroke pain) (Bowsher, Leijon, & Thuomas, 1998). Despite the fact that the classic description of thalamic stroke producing pain was published >100 years ago (Dejerine and Roussy, 1906), the mechanisms underlying the severe, spontaneous, burning pain that occurs with thalamic stroke remain unclear. However, it is clear that damage to specific regions of the brain produces central pain. In operculo-insular pain, a central pain syndrome resulting from posterior parasylvian lesions, thermal and pain sensations are altered and laser-evoked potentials to thermo-nociceptive stimuli are abnormal (Garcia-Larrea et al., 2010).

A pseudothalamic syndrome, producing pain asymbolia (absent or inadequate emotional responses to painful stimuli) (Berthier, Starkstein & Leiguarda, 1988), results from a stroke producing damage to the posterior insula region (Masson, Koskas, Cambier & Masson., 1991). This is consistent with evidence indicating a significant role of the posterior insula in processing of thalamic pain (Craig, 2000).

Diagnostic Applications of Neuroanatomy

Clinical neurological exams and lesion localization

Patel, and Foye (2017) brought out a full explanation as stated, for patients who have neurologic symptoms, there is a series of steps known as the neurologic method that must be followed. The lesions’ anatomy and pathophysiology must be identified via careful history and accurate neurologic examination. A differential diagnosis is generated, and specific and appropriate tests are performed. Neurology is perhaps the only specialty in medicine that is, able to diagnose most, if not all, neurological diseases simply by understanding the anatomy of the nervous system. The brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves form a neuroaxis, which starts at the cerebral cortex and ends at the level of the muscles. In neurology, the lesion must be located along the neuroaxis in order to come up with the correct differential diagnosis. A weakness in the hand can be due to any lesion along the neuroaxis; cortex, subcortical white matter, basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum, brainstem, spinal cord, brachial or pelvic plexus, peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junctions, and muscles. After the lesion’s location is identified, a variety of pathophysiologic causes should be evaluated. These include vascular, infectious, neoplastic, degenerative, traumatic, toxic-metabolic, and immune-mediated causes. Following the neurologic method helps to prevent incorrect diagnoses due to symptoms that mimic those of other conditions. In order to identify a lesion along the neuroaxis, a few rules need to be followed. A thorough history must be obtained, followed by a complete examination to locate the lesion responsible for any signs and symptoms. For example, unsteadiness is probably from a lesion in the cerebellum, whereas bilateral vision loss is most likely due to a lesion in the occipital visual cortex.

Selected Diagnostic Techniques For Neurological Disorders

The section describes advances in diagnostic techniques for confirming or ruling out a neurologic disorder or potentially disabling impairment. MRI techniques are where most of the advancements have occurred

magnetic resonance imaging, especially when combined with advanced techniques or other diagnostics, can show anatomical images of the brain or spinal cord, measure blood flow, or reveal deposits of minerals such as iron. According to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, (NINDS, 2022) “MRI is used to diagnose stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain and spinal cord tumors, inflammation, infection, vascular irregularities, brain damage associated with epilepsy, abnormally developed brain regions, and some neurodegenerative disorders. MRI is also used to diagnose and monitor disorders such as multiple sclerosis”.

Advances in MRI techniques and the combination of MRI technology with other diagnostic techniques represent a large percentage of the new diagnostic techniques developed over the past 30 years.

Because so many different MRI-based diagnostic tests exist—a large percentage of which have been developed over the past three decades—the committee chose to not attempt to uncover and list all of them. Instead, the committee has assembled representative examples of how various forms of MRI are being used in diagnostics today, including functional MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (dwMRI), and others (MS Trust, 2022: Palace, 2001; Tobin, 2022; Traboulsee & Li, 2006)

Positron Emission Tomography

Politis and Piccini (2012) made a statement explaining Positron emission tomography (PET), which is a particularly powerful way to peer into the brain and observe what is happening in real time. It is used to examine brain metabolism, alterations in regional blood flow, and receptor binding of various neurotransmitters. It can be used to diagnose such neurological disorders as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and various dementias. The major reason it is not used in clinical diagnoses more widely is that at this point it is very expensive because it requires a cyclotron to create the beam of photons and radiochemicals for injection into the bloodstream systems.

Electroencephalogram

Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a procedure that measures electrical activity in the brain using small electrodes attached to the scalp. The patterns it records in different regions of the brain will show normal or abnormal activity, such as slower waves or sharper spikes, that can indicate brain disorders.

Routine EEG has been around since the 1920s and used extensively as one of the main diagnostic tests for epilepsy as well as diagnosing other brain disorders such as, tumors, stroke, sleep disorders, or brain damage from a head injury (Mayo Clinic, 2023b), But as digital technology has advanced in more recent decades, advances in EEG have emerged, including prolonged EEG either with or without video, which can provide more assured diagnoses, and identify regions of the brain where the abnormalities are occurring to inform surgical evaluation.

Neurosurgical Planning: Tumor Resection and Epilepsy Surgery

The accurate determination of neuroanatomy stands vital for neurosurgical operations which include tumor resection together with epilepsy surgery because surgeons must protect important brain tissue. Medical imaging approaches along with intraoperative mapping work together to locate the eloquent brain areas through functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for protecting vital functions of language and motor control and sensory processing. Accurate localization of seizure foci through surgery regarding functional areas becomes vital in epilepsy procedures because it enables maximal seizure control without causing permanent neurological damage.

Role of Anatomical Landmarks in Avoiding Functional Loss

The brain terrain in fact needs anatomical landmark points for neurosurgical guidance in helping surgeons during procedures. The surgical process relies on structure identification to mark operation boundaries through central sulcus and precentral gyrus discovery and vascular pattern recognition. Surgical operations become more precise and functional problems after surgical procedures decrease when surgeons use these landmarks in combination with modern imaging procedures.

Deep Brain Stimulation and Targeted Interventions

The treatment plan of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) requires surgeons to position electrodes inside distinct brain regions for the management of neural signals. Medical clinicians use DBS to treat several neurological and psychiatric diseases especially Parkinson’s disease and dystonia and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The success of DBS depends heavily on exact surgical placement of the electrodes into brain regions including subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus. Electrode implantation precision has been on a rise with advancements in both neuroanatomical and imaging techniques, mapping which has enabled a better clinical result.

Neuroanatomy and Emerging Research

The academic study of neuroanatomy continues to advance beyond brute dissection techniques along with simple atlas examination. The field which mixes with modern technological progresses which enables scientists to analyze brain structures and functions with high precision in real-time at various depths. These breakthroughs transform both brain plasticity research and the fields of medical teaching as well as diagnostics and surgical preparations. The brain science revolution depends heavily on four leading areas of research development: connectomics together with neuroplasticity along with artificial intelligence while adding virtual neuroanatomy.

Connectomics and Brain Mapping Projects

Scientists use connectomics to map all neural connections within the brain which results in developing a practical diagram describing nervous system wiring. The endeavor aims to define how neural cells establish physical and operational connections through brain regions to support perception together with cognition and behavior and emotional responses.

The MICrONS (Machine Intelligence from Cortical Networks) project receives funding from the U.S. BRAIN Initiative to achieve one of the most advanced brain initiatives in this domain. Scientists presenting a high-definition three-dimensional model of mouse visual cortex revealed 84,000 neuronal cells and greater than 500 million inter-neuronal connections in 2024. New types of neural connections have been discovered through comprehensive detail analysis which improves our understanding of visual stimulus processing by neuronal circuits (The Guardian, 2024).

On a larger scale, the Human Connectome Project (HCP) has designed extensive brain connectivity charts through MRI alongside diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) examinations. Identification of structural-functional relationships requires these initiatives while network dysfunction analysis serves to understand psychiatric and neurological conditions including schizophrenia, autism and Alzheimer’s disease. (Van Essen et al., 2020)

Neuroplasticity and Anatomical Remodeling

Neuroplasticity, also known as neural plasticity or brain plasticity, is a process that involves adaptive structural and functional changes to the brain. A good definition is “the ability of the nervous system to change its activity in response to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, functions, or connections (Mateos-Aparicio, & Rodríguez-Moreno, 2019). Clinically, it is the process of brain changes after injury, such as a stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI). These changes can either be beneficial (restoration of function after injury), neutral (no change), or negative (can have pathological consequences).

Plasticity leads to two types of structural and functional changes in the brain tissue including dendritic branching and synapse development but also includes modifications in synaptic strength. The targeted rehabilitation process helps stroke patients by enabling unaffected cortical areas to take over lost function regions which have suffered infarct damage. Regulation of plasticity in autism spectrum disorders leads to abnormal developmental patterns which create both beneficial and destructive results.

Clinically, several treatment options can be used to help guide neuroplasticity in restoring function and treating unwanted symptoms. An example is mirror therapy, a technique used in phantom limb pain. In a basic premise, the patent uses a mirror to cover their amputation and focuses on watching their intact limb perform activities while imaging that both limbs are performing the same activity. This has been shown to have increased activation and functional connectivity in the frontoparietal network (Maier, Ballester, & Verschure, 2019). One of the most studied rehabilitation techniques is constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Used in patients with a stroke, the premise is that by constraining the functional limb, the affected limb is engaged in repetitive task practice and behavioral shaping. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology, patients who engage in this therapy have been shown to have increased activity in their contralateral premotor and secondary somatosensory cortex in association with improved function ( Johansen-Berg et al., 2002).

Recent imaging and histological studies have shown that even in adulthood, the brain demonstrates important plasticity in adults according to recent imaging and histological findings which oppose the standard belief that brain structure becomes immutable after the critical period. Researchers have found that localized plastic changes produce extended influence on distant neural operations (Cramer et al., 2011).

AI and Machine Learning in Analyzing Neuroimaging

Fig. 1. The application of Artificial Intelligence to neuroimaging activities detects diseases in patients through deep learning algorithms that read MRI/CT scans to identify tumors and strokes and Alzheimer’s disease effectively. The system advances treatment methods through medical image examination along with patient information analysis to create customized plans and forecast results and performs automated imaging activities to enhance fast and precise diagnosis processes.

The upcoming development of AI-driven neuroimaging requires immediate attention to resolve ethical issues linking to its technology domain. The use of AI algorithms in medical diagnostics requires immediate attention to bias issues because such discrimination may cause incorrect and unjust results (Borchert et al., 2023). To mitigate these issues and enhance the generalizability of the models, it is essential to train AI systems on diverse and representative datasets.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are becoming indispensable in the analysis of complex neuroimaging datasets. AI-driven tools are capable of detecting subtle changes in brain structure and activity that might be imperceptible to the human eye.

In clinical settings, AI is being used to:

• Segment lesions in MRI scans
• Detect early biomarkers of neurodegeneration
• Predict treatment outcomes
• Stratify patients for precision medicine

The success rate of deep learning algorithms particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) reaches exceptional levels in brain tumor classification as well as epilepsy focus localization and cognitive decline projection. AI function improves workflow processes along with imaging quality and it decreases the work burden on radiologists.

Research utilizes ML methods to analyze resting-state fMRI which aids brain-behavior relationship studies (Shen, Wu, & Suk, 2017).

Integration of Neuroanatomy in Virtual Simulations and Neurotechnology

Neuroanatomy now interacts with virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) and 3D modeling technologies to shift student and researcher and clinician interactions with human brain structures. Students can fully engage in an immersive viewing the structures of the brain through virtual neuroanatomy labs which will improve their spatial knowledge and understanding of anatomy. The virtual solutions offer students secure and scalable educational spaces that replace traditional cadaver dissection procedures effectively. Medical practitioners in neurosurgery currently use patient-specific brain models produced through 3D printing for their preoperative planning. Nurses in neurosurgery use simulated-operational models to reduce intraoperative dangers that occur during tumor resection or aneurysm clipping procedures.

Furthermore, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are emerging neurotechnologies that rely on anatomical precision to translate brain signals into commands for prosthetics or communication devices — offering hope for patients with severe motor impairments(Zinchuk, Flanaganm & Azad, 2022).

Future Directions in Neuroanatomy

1. Advances in Brain Mapping and 3D Anatomical Modeling

Advances in Brain Mapping and 3D Anatomical Modeling

Modern breakthroughs in brain mapping have transformed our knowledge base about neural designs. The MICrONS project managed to create the most detailed 3D map of a mammalian brain through its reconstruction of a tiny visual cortex segment from a mouse. Researchers used this project to analyze 84,000 neurons alongside 500 million synapses which contributed significant understanding of brain structure and function.

Scientists at MIT have produced imaging systems which allow scientists to visualize entire human brain halves at the cellular-edge scale. The technique enables scientists to study neural connections along with proteins while increasing their brain organization knowledge.

Google Research together with Harvard University published the most advanced 3D brain tissue reconstruction that human science has ever attained. This research project provided essential information about brain nerve patterns which expanded our understanding of brain cell links while advancing our understanding of neurological diseases (Shapson-Coe et al.,2024).

Improving Medical Education with Virtual Neuroanatomy Tools

The rise in the utilization of educational technologies and tools over the last two decades has facilitated the emergence of digital education [Obrero-Gaitán, Nieto-Escamez, Zagalaz-Anula, and Cortés-Pérez, 2021; Martinengo et al., 2020] Today, applications such as electronic resources, game-based learning, and VR are being extensively utilized for learning and acquiring professiona practice skills.

Modern students better understand complex deep brain structures through their use of tablets and smartphones [Obrero-Gaitán et al., 2021; Wainman et al., 2018]. The two-dimensional viewing capabilities of these technologies restrict students from comprehending the subject from a three-dimensional perspective which makes it difficult for them to understand dimensional relationships of brain anatomy.

Error-free 3D brain models, developed for academic purposes and accredited by experts in the subject, can be easily integrated into a VR environment. This allows detailed examination of numerous structures in the normal human brain that are not visible to the naked eye. The only disadvantage of this method is its inability to replicate the textural stimuli experienced during cadaver dissection. However, wearable technologies developed using today’s advancements have addressed tactile feedback issues.

Moreover, VR technologies enable students to interact with such technology in reproducible and controllable environmen [Obrero-Gaitán et al., 2021; Bennett, & Saunders, 2019]. This technology enables students to experience learning content through various sensory inputs, including sight, sound, and touch, thereby immersing them in the virtual environment (25). Additionally, its repeatability allows students to enhance their learning in the classroom beyond the predetermined study program [Obrero-Gaitán et al., 2021; Zhao, Xu, Jiang, & Ding, 2020] Examination of the literature on 3D visualization of the nervous system revealed a significant increase in interest. In 2011, only 4 articles on VR and AR emphasized this topic, a number that increased to 18 and 10 by today. This trend highlights VR’s advantageous position among new technologies for viewing and manipulating neuroanatomical structures with interactivity.

Sotgiu et al., (2020) put out saying It signifies a significant shift in how people learn about neuroanatomy, with the cadaver-based learning method being increasingly replaced by technology between 2011 and 2018. Additionally, eight studies utilizing educational technologies such as VR and AR have been documented to explore the use of 3D in neuroanatomy. Some of these methods include local VR-based stereo-imaging techniques for learning about the ventricular system and neurovascular structures (Stepan et al., 2017), skull, (Kockro et al., 2015; Goodarzi, Monti, Lee & Girgis, 2017), brain structures, and cranial nerves (Kockro et al., 2015). Our observations indicate that although the number of these studies has increased, they remain insufficient. Furthermore, these studies have predominantly focused on superficial brain structures to demonstrate neuroanatomical structures to students. However, it would be intriguing to develop and utilize VR and AR applications for 3D visualization of deep brain structures in neuroanatomy education In a study conducted by Estevez, Lindgren, and Bergethon (2010), they emphasized that physical models that allow for high levels of manipulation of deep brain structures yield positive result.

Sotgiu et al., (2020) observed that VR applications in neuroanatomy education, which utilize accredited models prepared by experts and error-free neuroanatomical structures, meet students’ educational expectations. Nevertheless, our study also has its limitations. VR glasses used in education can only accommodate one student at a time and may induce dizziness, nausea, or vomiting in users. The VR application features various drawbacks but delivers major benefits to users. By placing learners in a virtual simulation they experience being inside anatomical structures to explore them in real time. Neuroanatomy education needs immediate modifications to incorporate clinical practice instructions together with modern technology frameworks which support student motivation and enable efficient immediate and prolonged learning.

Challenges and Limitations in Neuroanatomy

1. Limitations in Structural Knowledge Without Functional Data

While structural neuroanatomy emits a well explained mapping of the regions of the brain, it usually lacks a strong insight into the dynamic processes underlying the functionality of the brain. This limitation hampers our knowing of how specified neural structures connects to cognitive and behavioral outcomes. For an example, anatomical traditional studies may not show us how neural circuits communicate during complex tasks or on how disruptions in these circuits ends to neurological diseases.​

Moreover, the use of animal models for structural research creates difficulties when translating discovered information to human brain operations because of species-specific variations. The present deficit emphasizes the necessity of combining functional imaging methods that use fMRI and PET with structural investigation to explain complete brain activity.

2. Individual Anatomical Variation

The varied structure of human brains affects the results from research studies and medical treatment approaches. Brain structural differences including size and shape together with cytoarchitectural patterns affect how neurons link with each other while managing their operational capacity. Neuromodulation therapy delivery and effectiveness through transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) get altered because of brain structure differences that include skull thickness and cerebrospinal fluid patterns and cortical folds. Computational models show that neurological disparities in brain anatomy generate variable electric field patterns through the cortex which in turn affects treatment results.

This variability importance personalized partake in both of the clinical and research settings to show for a person’s differences in the anatomy of the brain.​

3. Access to Advanced Neuroimaging in Low-Resource Settings

PET and high-field MRI scanners normally remain scarce in low-resource situations because they require expensive equipment and specialized personnel to operate as well as advanced infrastructure systems. The empty distribution of these diagnostic tools constrains medical facilities from delivering adequate neurological treatments in affected areas.

A new generation of solutions attempts to solve this issue. LFMRI device manufacturers including OSII ONE work to create affordable portable neuroimaging machines which provide an alternate solution. Pilot tests conducted in Uganda together with Paraguay have proven the possibility to construct enduring LFMRI devices through the use of mostly indigenous materials and resources. Recent upadated neuroimaging technologies has shown potential to strengthen access to imaging services in different remote areas which results in rapid diagnosis and treatment of varous neurological conditions.

4. Ethical Concerns in Neurosurgical Interventions

The ethical evaluation of neurosurgical interventions depends on brain complexity because surgery creates potential risks for patients. The main ethical difficulties stem from earning valid patient consent especially with patients who exhibit decision-making problems as well as the judgment of surgery’s advantages versus possible adverse effects. The ethical challenges also faced by healthcare providers in these areas grow worse because both severe medical provider shortages and limited healthcare funding create difficulties in making medical choices. Decisions about surgical treatment distribution among limited resources cause healthcare professionals to question both equitable and fair delivery of medical care.

Furthermore, the implementation of new neurosurgical technologies and procedures requires thorough ethical reading to guarantee patient self-determination protection and security. Neurosurgical professionals need ongoing discourse together with ethical framework development to handle the complex issues that exist in their practice.

Future Directions in Neuroanatomy

1. Advances in Brain Mapping and 3D Anatomical Modeling

Research in brain mapping technology has dramatically expanded our knowledge of neural patterns. Through the MICrONS project scientists obtained the most detailed 3D brain structure of a mammalian nervous system by creating an accurate digital model of a mouse visual cortex. The analytical study conducted a comprehensive 3D mapping of 84,000 neurons alongside 500 million synapses that delivered advanced understanding of brain operations (The Guardian, 2024).

A research team at MIT created instruments which generate 3D images of entire human brain hemispheres when viewed at a sub-cellular level. The new technology provides in-depth assessment of brain proteins and neural connections to help scientists better understand how the brain organizes itself (Orenstein, 2024).

Working jointly Google Research and Harvard University achieved the highest resolution 3D brain tissue mapping ever created. Researchers gained research knowledge about human brain microscopic structure alongside fundamental understanding of neural connections and suspected neurological implications (The Guardian, 2024).

2. Integrative Approaches with Genetics and Neurophysiology

The combination of genetics with neurophysiology methods enables researchers to develop advanced knowledge about brain operations. Studies in recent times show that genetic factors and brain structure determine brain-related disorders within biological frameworks. New evidence about the relationship of neuropsychiatric diseases to regional brain morphology emerged from brain imaging genome-wide association studies (GWAS) according to Whalley and Hall (2022).

Furthermore, Researchers efforts are more concentrated on building brain multi-molecular maps through combined methods which merge omics information with imaging data. Researchers implement this approach to gain diagnostic and therapeutic brain disease knowledge by uniting molecular analytics with modern imaging systems ( Zhou et al., 2023).

Zhou et al., (2023) showed in his studies, he highlighted the role of integrative physiology in understanding gene function within the context of intact organisms. This approach works through on the investigation of how genetic factors influence physiological processes, contributing to our knowledge of complex biological systems

3. Improving Medical Education with Virtual Neuroanatomy Tools

Virtual reality (VR) is transforming, medical education benefits from virtual reality (VR) technology through its creation of involved educational environments which train students more effectively. Research has shown that VR-based applications produce memory enhancement and better success outcomes than traditional neuroanatomy teaching methods (Gazi Medical Journal, 2024).

Another research has shown that deep VR learning systems for neuroanatomy teaching produces better spatial understanding while gratifying students more than traditional educational approaches do (Gazi Medical Journal, 2024). The University of Jaén deployed an online virtual teaching protocol built on VR technology for physiotherapy students to show VR applications in remote medical education delivery.

The School of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University applies Microsoft HoloLens Virtual Reality equipment to decrease the need for cadaver dissection in anatomy education. HoloAnatomy Software Suite from the university provides three-dimensional human body maps which enable students to learn anatomy more rapidly and distinctly (Smith, 2023).

• Personalized Medicine Based on Anatomical Profiles

Healthcare providers want to use individualized anatomical profiles when giving medical treatments. Medical professionals use molecular imaging approaches including morphological/anatomical imaging and nanobody-based molecular imaging to find medical pathologies so they can direct precise patient care which relies heavily on surgical and anatomical pathology examination. The precise identification of tumors by these methods leads to proper treatment strategies which progress patient-specific therapies.

According to the Personalized Medicine Coalition individuals will have their complete genomic sequence linked to medical records in the future. The combined approach enables healthcare professionals to use genetic vulnerability information for creating proactive and whole-person healthcare approaches (Personalized Medicine Coalition, 2012).

Moreover, precision medicine approaches drug delivery systems under development as well as reconstruct interventions based on lifestyle, genetic background, and medical histories of individuals.

Conclusion

so has all that has been said unto this topic, being concluded, the understanding of neuroanatomy serves as the pinpoint of the study of neurology, giving a well structural framework approach important for knowing the nervous systems their functions and also their dysfunctions. Clinicians hope on working with a detailed anatomical understanding to localize lesions and also decipher clinical symptoms, giving an accurate diagnoses and efficient treatment plans. This clinic-anatomic correlation is fundamental in the knowledge of neurology, where there is an accurate identification of an affected neural structure, informs therapeutic decisions.  The identification of more known neurological disorders rely strongly on valuable data knowledge and the structure of the brain. The identification of affected brain areas in stroke management becomes quicker through knowing how vascular territories overlap with neural pathways. Medical experts make use of neurological mappings to locate and examine neuro-degenerative disorders starting early in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s patients. Surgical planning for epilepsy patients becomes better and leads to improved results when anatomical and functional imaging maps the seizure-generating areas.

The major act of neuroanatomy has rapidly expanded with new updated advancements in clinical practice and neuroscience. Brain mapping revolutionary techniques, popular one we know of is “high-resolution 3D reconstructions”, which have done an intricate neural network, broadening out our knowledge of the brain functionality and also connectivity. This developmental progress has not only deepened out comprehension the brain structural design, but also paved a way for novel therapeutic working point.

Additionally, by integrating neuroanatomy knowledge and understanding with adding in neurophysiology and genetics is encouraging a refined view to medicine. Physiological data and genetic markers, medical professional workers can improve efficiently, tailor interventions to individual patients and minimizing adverse effects.

In the heart of medical education, the understanding the tools used for virtual neuroanatomy are changing learning experiences.

Students can now partake in working with in person virtual reality simulations and 3D models to read and understand complex neuroanatomical structural components in virtual environments that enhances their abilities to remember and understand spatial relationships.

Neurological investigations of neurological conditions depend on neuroanatomy studies for their purpose of understanding structural and functional aspects of brain physiology. Continuous advancement in this field requires both interprofessional partnerships as well as technological breakthroughs to enhance diagnosis abilities and prophylaxis abilities and therapeutic responses for neurological conditions thus improving patient care quality and therapeutic outcomes.

REFERENCES:

Abbruzzese. G., & Berardelli, A. (2003). Sensorimotor integration in movement disorders. Mov Disord. 2003;18:231–40. doi: 10.1002/mds.10327.

Adigun, O.O., Reddy, V., Varacallo, M.A., & StatPearls [Internet]. (2023). StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jun 26, 2023. Anatomy, Back, Spinal Cord.

Albano, B., Dinia, L., Del, Sette, M., Gandolfo, C., Sivori, G., & Finocchi, C. (2010). Fabry disease in patients with migraine with aura. Neurol Sci. 2010;31(Suppl 1):S167–9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-010-0314-5.

American Stroke Association. Transient ischemic attack (TIA). American Heart Association. Accessed January 29, 2024.)

Angeles Fernández-Gil, M., Palacios-Bote, R., Leo-Barahona, M., & Mora-Encinas, JP. (2010). Anatomy of the brainstem: a gaze into the stem of life. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010 Jun;31(3):196-219. 

Bennett, J.A., & Saunders, C.P. (2019). A Virtual Tour of the Cell: Impact of Virtual Reality on Student Learning and Engagement in the STEM Classroom. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2019; 20: 20.2.37.

Bermejo, P.E., Oreja-Guevara. C., & Diez-Tejedor. E. (2010). Pain in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, mechanisms, types and treatment. Rev Neurol. 2010;50:101–8.

Berthier, M., Starkstein, S., & Leiguarda, R. (1988). Asymbolia for pain: a sensory-limbic disconnection syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1988;24:41–9. doi: 10.1002/ana.410240109.

Bican, O., Minagar, A., & Pruitt, A.A. (2013). The spinal cord: a review of functional neuroanatomy. Neurol Clin. 2013 Feb;31(1):1-18.

Boecker. H., Ceballos-Baumann. A., Bartenstein. P., Weindl. A., Siebner. H.R., Fassbender, T., et al. (1991). Sensory processing in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease: investigations with 3D H(2)(15)O-PET. Brain. 1999;122(Pt 9):1651–65. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.9.1651.

Borchert, R.J. Azevedo, T. Badhwar, A., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence for diagnostic and prognostic neuroimaging in dementia: a systematic review Alzheimers Dement, 19,  pp. 5885-5904

Borsook. D., Upadhyay, J., Chudler, E,H., & Becerra. L., A key role of the basal ganglia in pain and analgesia–insights gained through human functional imaging. Mol Pain. 2010;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-6-27.

Bowsher. D., Leijon, G., & Thuomas, K.A. (1998). Central poststroke pain: correlation of MRI with clinical pain characteristics and sensory abnormalities. Neurology. 1998;51:1352–8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.5.1352.

Catala M, Kubis N. Gross anatomy and development of the peripheral nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:29-41.)

Chayer, C. (2001). Freedman M. Frontal lobe functions. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2001 Nov;1(6):547-52.

Clavelou. P., Besson, G., Elziere, C., Ferrier, A., Pinard, J.M., Hermier, M., et al. (2006). Neurological aspects of Fabry’s disease. Rev Neurol. 2006;162:569–80. doi: 10.1016/s0035-3787(06)75051-2.

Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Peripheral Nervous System (PNS): What It Is & Function. Peripheral Nervous System (PNS)

Corey, J.M. (2006). Genetic disorders producing compressive radiculopathy. Semin Neurol. 2006;26:515–22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951624.

Craig, A.D. (2000). The functional anatomy of lamina I and its role in post-stroke central pain. Prog Brain Res. 2000;129:137–51. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)29010-9. 

Cramer, S. C., et al. (2011). Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 134(6), 1591–1609.

Dejerine, J., & Roussy, G. (1906). Le syndrome thalamique. Revue Neurologique. 1906;14:521–32

DeMaagd, G., & Philip, A. (2015). Parkinson’s Disease and Its Management: Part 1: Disease Entity, Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Diagnosis. P T.  Aug;40(8):504-32.

Diaz, E., & Morales, H. (2016).  Spinal Cord Anatomy and Clinical Syndromes. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016 Oct;37(5):360-71.

Ding, C., Wu, Y., Chen, X., Chen, Y., Wu, Z., Lin, Z., Kang, D., Fang, W., & Chen, F. (2022).  Global, regional, and national burden and attributable risk factors of neurological disorders: The Global Burden of Disease study 1990–2019. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;10:952161.Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36523572/(accessed 18.2.2024)

Dziedzic, M., Ostrowski, P., Gosh, S.K., Balawender, K., Koziej, M., & Bonczar, M. (2024). Exploring the evolution of anatomy: from historical foundations to modern insights Trans. Res. Anat., 35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2024.100286

Estevez, M.E., Lindgren, K.A., & Bergethon, P.R. (2010). A novel three-dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3: 309-17.

Fellgiebel, A., Muller, M.J., & Ginsberg, L. (2006). CNS manifestations of Fabry’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:791–5. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70548-8.

Finger, S. (2001). Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations into brain function. Oxford University Press. NCBI – Anatomy, Central Nervous System

Frostell. A., Hakim, R., Thelin, E.P., Mattsson, P., & Svensson, M. (2016). A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord. Front Neurol. 2016;7:238. 

García-Peñas JJ. (2009). [Autism, epilepsy and temporal lobe pathology]. Rev Neurol. 2009 Feb 27;48 Suppl 2:S35-45.

Garcia-Larrea. L., Perchet, C., Creac’h, C., Convers, P., Peyron. R., Laurent, B, et al. (2010). Operculo-insular pain (parasylvian pain): a distinct central pain syndrome. Brain. 2010;133:2528–39. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq220

Gazi Medical Journal. (2024). Comparison and evaluation of the effectiveness of traditional neuroanatomy teaching in medical education with virtual-reality application based on 3D virtual neuroanatomical models. Gazi Medical Journal, 35(1), 1–10.

Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., & Mangun G.R. (2018). Cognitive Neuroscience: the Biology of the Mind (fourth ed.), W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

Goodarzi, A., Monti, S., Lee, D., & Girgis, F. (2017). Effect of Stereoscopic Anaglyphic 3-Dimensional Video Didactics on Learning Neuroanatomy. World Neurosurg. 2017; 107: 35-9.

Grau-Lopez. L., Sierra, S., Martinez-Caceres. E., & Ramo-Tello, C. (2010). Analysis of the pain in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurologia. 2011;26:208–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2010.07.014

Grove, M., Vonsattel, J.P., Mazzoni, P., & Marder, K. (2003). Huntington’s disease. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ. 2003;2003:dn3. doi: 10.1126/sageke.2003.43.dn3

Hoffmann, B., Beck, M., Sunder-Plassmann, G., Borsini, W., Ricci, R., & Mehta, A. (2007). Nature and prevalence of pain in Fabry disease and its response to enzyme replacement therapy–a retrospective analysis from the Fabry outcome survey. Clin J Pain. 2007;23:535–42. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318074c986.

Hounsfield, G.N., & Radiol, Br. J. (1973). Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system 46 (552), pp. 1016-1022,

Huson, S.M., Acosta, M.T., Belzberg, A.J., Bernards, A., Chernoff, J., Cichowski, K., et al. (2011). Back to the future: proceedings from the 2010 NF Conference. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:307–21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33804.

Jimsheleishvili, S., Dididze, M., & StatPearls [Internet]. (2023). StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jul 24. Neuroanatomy, Cerebellum.

Johansen-Berg. H., Dawes, H., Guy, C., Smith, S.M., Wade, D.T., & Matthews, P.M. (2002). Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain. 2002 Dec;125(Pt 12):2731-42

Johnson EO, Vekris M, Demesticha T, Soucacos PN. Neuroanatomy of the brachial plexus: normal and variant anatomy of its formation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Mar;32(3):291-7.)

Kenner. M., & Menon. U. (2007).  Elliott DG. Multiple sclerosis as a painful disease. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007; 79:303–21. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(07)79013-X.

Kockro, R.A., Amaxopoulou, C., Killeen, T., Wagner, W., Reisch, R., Schwandt, E., et al. (2015). Stereoscopic neuroanatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Ann Anat. 2015; 201: 91-8.

Koyama. T., Kato, K., & Mikami. A. (2000). During pain-avoidance neurons activated in the macaque anterior cingulate and caudate. Neurosci Lett. 2000; 283:17–20. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)00894-6. 

Lauterbur, P.C. (1973). Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance nature, 242 (5394), pp. 190-191]

Lanciego, J.L., Luquin, N., & Obeso, J.A. (2012). Functional neuroanatomy of the basal ganglia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012 Dec 01;2(12):a009621.

Lasater, E.A., L.i. F., Bessler, W.K., Estes, M.L., Vemula, S., Hingtgen, C.M., et al. Genetic and cellular evidence of vascular inflammation in neurofibromin-deficient mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:859–70. doi: 10.1172/JCI41443,

Leijnse JN, D’Herde K. Revisiting the segmental organization of the human spinal cord. J Anat. 2016 Sep;229(3):384-93.)

Lu-Emerson, C., & Plotkin, S.R. (2009). The neurofibromatoses. Part 2: NF2 and schwannomatosis. Rev Neurol Dis. 2009;6:E81–6.

MacCollin, M., Chiocca, E.A., Evans, D.G., Friedman, J.M., Horvitz, R., Jaramillo, D., et al. (2005). Diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis. Neurology. 2005;64:1838–45. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163982.78900.AD.

Maier, M., Ballester, B.R., & Verschure PFMJ. (2019). Principles of Neurorehabilitation After Stroke Based on Motor Learning and Brain Plasticity Mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:74

Martinengo, L., Yeo, N.J.Y., Markandran, K.D., Olsson, M., Kyaw, B.M., & Car, L.T. (2020). Digital health professions education on chronic wound management: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; 104: 103512.

Masson, C., Koskas, P., Cambier, J., & Masson, M. (1991). Left pseudothalamic cortical syndrome and pain asymbolia. Rev Neurol. 1991;147:668–70.

Mateos-Aparicio, P., & Rodríguez-Moreno, A. (2019). The Impact of Studying Brain Plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:66

Mayo, Clinic. Eeg (electroencephalogram). (2023). [March 20, 2023]. https://www​.mayoclinic​.org/tests-procedures​/eeg/about/pac-20393875 . 

Moore, D.F., Ye, F., Schiffmann, R., & Butman, J.A. (2003). Increased signal intensity in the pulvinar on T1-weighted images: a pathognomonic MR imaging sign of Fabry disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1096–101.

Murray, C. J. L., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., … & Lopez, A. D. (2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380(9859), 2197–2223.

MS Trust (Multiple Sclerosis Trust), (2022). How is MS diagnosed? [November 20, 2022]. https://www​.mstrust.org​.uk/information-support​/ms-symptoms-diagnosis​/how-is-ms-diagnosed . 

Namba K. Vascular Anatomy of the Cauda Equina and Its Implication on the Vascular Lesions in the Caudal Spinal Structure. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016 Jun 15;56(6):310-6.)

Nill, M., Muller, M.J., Beck, M., Stoeter, P., & Fellgiebel, A. (2006). Pathophysiological aspects of brain structural disturbances in patients with Fabry disease: literature review. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2006;74:687–95. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932190.

NINDS (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke). Neurological diagnostics tests and procedures fact sheet. 2022. [November 15, 2022]. https://www​.ninds.nih​.gov/neurological-diagnostic-tests-and-procedures-fact-sheet

Nurnberger, M., & Moll, I. (1994). Semiquantitative aspects of mast cells in normal skin and in neurofibromas of neurofibromatosis types 1 and 5. Dermatology. 1994;188:296–9. doi: 10.1159/000247170

Obrero-Gaitán, E., Nieto-Escamez, F.A., Zagalaz-Anula, N., & Cortés-Pérez, I. (2021). An Innovative Approach for Online Neuroanatomy and Neurorrehabilitation Teaching Based on 3D Virtual Anatomical Models Using Leap Motion Controller During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 590196.)

O’Connor. A.B., Schwid, S.R., Herrmann, D.N., Markman, J.D., & Dworkin. R.H. (2008). Pain associated with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and proposed classification. Pain. 2008;137:96–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.024.

Orenstein, D. (2024, June 17). Technologies enable 3D imaging of whole human brain hemispheres at subcellular resolution. MIT News.

Pagnini, I., Borsini, W., Cecchi, F., Sgalambro, A., Olivotto, I., Frullini, A., et al. (2011). Distal limb pain as presenting feature of fabry disease. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:390–5. doi: 10.1002/acr.20385.

Palace, J. (2001). Making the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry. 2001;71:ii3–ii8.

Patel, A. T., & Foye, P. M. (2017). Neurologic diagnosis: The neurologic method and neuroanatomy. In D. E. Greer, J. R. Monga, & R. J. Mckenna (Eds.), Neurology Secrets (5th ed., pp. 1–15). Elsevier.

Personalized Medicine Coalition. (2012). The case for personalized medicine. https://www.personalizedmedicinecoalition.org/Userfiles/PMC-Corporate/file/the_case_for_pm1.pdf

Peters, A., Palay, S.L., & Webster, H.D. (1991). The Fine Structure of the Nervous System: Neurons and Their Supporting Cells (third ed.), Oxford University Press.

Politis, M., & Piccini, P. (2012). Positron emission tomography imaging in neurological disorders. Journal of Neurology. 2012;259(9):1769–1780.

Purves, D., Augustine, G.J., Fitzpatrick, D et al.. (2018). Neuroscience (sixth ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.

Rajmohan, V., & Mohandas, E. (2007). The limbic system. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;49(2):132-9.

Ro, T., Farne, A., Johnson, R.M., Wedeen, V., Chu, Z., & Wang, Z.J., et al. (2007). Feeling sounds after a thalamic lesion. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:433241. doi: 10.1002/ana.21219.

Ross, C.A., & Tabrizi, S.J. (2011). Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:83–98. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3.

Sacktor, N. (2002). The epidemiology of HIV-associated neurological disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of NeuroVirology, 8(2), 81–86.

Saito T, Steinke H, Miyaki T, Nawa S, Umemoto K, Miyakawa K, Wakao N, Asamoto K, Nakano T. Analysis of the posterior ramus of the lumbar spinal nerve: the structure of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jan;118(1):88-94.)

Serletis, D., Parkin, P., Bouffet, E., Shroff, M., Drake, J.M., & Rutka, J.T. (2007). Massive plexiform neurofibromas in childhood: natural history and management issues. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:363–7. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.5.363.

Schachter, A.S., & Davis, K.L. (2000). Alzheimer’s disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci.  Jun;2(2):91-100. 

Shapson-Coe A, et al. (2024). A petavoxel fragment of human cerebral cortex reconstructed at nanoscale resolution. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.adk4858 (2024).

Shen, D., Wu, G., & Suk, H. I. (2017). Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 19, 221–248.

Shepherd, G.M. (1991). Foundations of the Neuron Doctrine Oxford University Press

Shipp, S. (2007). Structure and function of the cerebral cortex. Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 19;17(12):R443-9.

Smith, S.M., & Nichols T. E. (2018). Statistical challenges in “big data” human neuroimaging Neuron, 97 (2) pp. 263-268 

Smith, D. I. (2023, January 27). How VR is helping prevent the need for cadavers. Lifewire.

Solaro. C., Messmer. & Uccelli., M. (2010). Pharmacological management of pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Drugs. 2010;70:1245–54. doi: 10.2165/11537930-000000000-00000.

Sotgiu, M.A., Mazzarello, V., Bandiera, P., Madeddu, R., Montella, A., & Moxham, B. (2020). Neuroanatomy, the Achille’s Heel of Medical Students. A Systematic Analysis of Educational Strategies for the Teaching of Neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2020; 13: 107-16.

Staser, K., Yang, F.C., & Clapp, D.W. (2010). Plexiform neurofibroma genesis: questions of Nf1 gene dose and hyperactive mast cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2010;17:287–93. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e328339511b.

Stepan, K., Zeiger, J., Hanchuk, S., Del Signore, A., Shrivastava, R., Govindaraj, S., et al. (2017). Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017; 7: 1006-13.

The Guardian, (2024, May 9). Scientists find 57,000 cells and 150m neural connections in tiny sample of human brain.

The Guardian (2024, January 17). Mouse brain wiring map marks step forward for neuroscience and AI.

Tobin, O., & Mayo Clinic. 2022. [November 20, 2022]. Multiple sclerosis. https://www​.mayoclinic​.org/diseases-conditions​/multiple-sclerosis​/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20350274 .

Traboulsee, A.L., & Li, D.K. (2006). The role of MRI in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Advances in Neurology. 2006;98:125–146.

Van Essen, D. C., et al. (2013). The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective. NeuroImage, 62(4), 2222–2231.

Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Ismaili, N., Bastuji-Garin, S., Zeller, J., Wechsler, J., Revuz, J., et al. (2005). Symptoms associated with malignancy of peripheral nerve sheath tumours: a retrospective study of 69 patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153:79–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06558.x.

Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., … & Murray, C. J. L. (2012). Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380(9859), 2163–2196.

Wainman, B., Wolak, L., Pukas, G., Zheng, E., & Norman, G.R. (2018). The superiority of three-dimensional physical models to two-dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning. Med Educ. 2018; 52: 1138-46.

Wang, Y., Nicol, G.D., Clapp, D.W., & Hingtgen, C.M. (2005). Sensory neurons from Nf1 haploinsufficient mice exhibit increased excitability. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:3670–6. doi: 10.1152/jn.00489.2005.

Whalley, H. C., & Hall, L. S. (2022). Clinical opportunity awaits at the intersection of genomics and brain imaging. Nature Reviews Neurology, 18(9), 521–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00672-3

World Health Organization. (2004). Atlas: Country resources for neurological disorders 2004: Results of a collaborative study of the World Health Organization and the World Federation of Neurology. WHO Press.

World Health Organisation, (2020). What are neurological disorders? Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/what-are-neurological-disorders# (accessed 22 September).

Zinchuk, A. V., Flanagan, S. R., & Azad, T. D. (2022). Virtual and augmented reality in neuroanatomy education and neurosurgery. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 838289.

Zhao, J., X.u. X, Jiang, H., & Ding, Y. (2020). The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20: 127.

Zhou, Y., et al. (2023). Integrative omics analysis reveals epigenomic and transcriptomic alterations in major depressive disorder. Translational Psychiatry, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02724-8