Data Presentation and Analysis

Analysis of Objective I
To find out if global warming exist in Erhoike community
Research Hypothesis I
Global warming does not exist in Erhoike community.
In view of the research hypothesis I, questions 1, 2, and 3
in the structured questionnaire are sets of related questions that represents
data used in the analysis of the hypothesis I as shown in the table 4.1 below.

Table 4.1: Respondents’ opinion on the
existence of global warming in Erhoike community
S/N
QUESTIONS
YES
NO
TOTAL
1
Does global warming exist in Erhoike community?
90
30
120
2
Are resident in Erhoike community ignorant of the dangers
by global warming?
75
45
120
3
Does global warming occur frequently in Erhoike community?
58
62
120
                                   Total
223
137
360
The total number of respondents that
says “yes” is equal to 223 representing 61.9% while respondents that says “no”
is equal to 137 representing 38%. Details in appendix 11 shows that x2
calculated =18 while 0.05 table value of x2 at 2df = 5.991 since,
calculated x2 =18.12 is greater than x2 0.05=5.991 at
2df, the null hypothesis is thus rejected. The researcher therefore concluded
that global warming exists in Erhoike community near Kokori, Ethiope East Local
Government Area of Delta State.
Analysis of Objective II
To find out the causes of global
warming in Erhoike community
Research Hypothesis II
There are no causes of global warming
in Erhoike community
In view of the research hypothesis II questions 4, 5 and 6 in the structured
questionnaire are sets of related questions that represent data collected to
tackle the hypothesis II as shown in table 4.2 below.
Table
4.2: Respondents’ opinion on causes of global warming in Erhoike community
S/N
QUESTIONS
YES
NO
TOTAL
4
Are there causes of global warming in Erhoike community?
85
35
120
5
Does the flow-station in Erhoike community emit green
house gases?
100
20
120
6
Is burning of waste materials common in Erhoike community?
68
52
120
                                   Total
 253
107
360
The total number of respondents that
say “yes” is equal to 253 representing 70.3% while, those that says “no” are
equal to 107 representing 29.7% details in appendix iii shows that x2
calculated =20.4 while 0.05 table value of x2 at 2df =5.991. Since,
calculated x2= 20.4 is greater than x2 0.05= 5.991 at
2df, the null hypothesis is rejected which means that there are causes of
global warming in Erhoike community.
Analysis of Objective III
To find out the health implications of
global warming on the people of Erhoike community
Research hypothesis III
There are no health implications of
global warming on the people of Erhoike community
In view of the research hypothesis III,
questions 7, 8 and 9 in the structured questionnaire are sets related questions
that represents data collected meant to analysis the research hypothesis III as
shown in table 4.3 below
Table 4.2.3: Respondents’ opinion of
health implication of global warming on the people of Erhoike community
S/N
QUESTIONS
YES
NO
TOTAL
7
Are there any existing effect of global warming in the
life of people of Erhoike community
100
20
120
8
Are residents in Erhoike community faced with low yield in
their agricultural system due to global warming
88
32
120
9
Is the environment of Erhoike community polluted by green
house gases constantly                               
 59
64
120
Total
247
116
360
The total number of respondents that
say “yes” is equal to 247 representing 68.8% while, those that says “no” are
equal to 116 representing 32.2% details in appendix iv shows that x2
calculated 37.5 while 0.05 table value of x2 at 2df= 5.991. Since,
calculated x2 =37.5 is greater than x2 0.005=5.991 at
2df, the null hypothesis was rejected which means that there are health implications
of global warming on the people of Erhoike community. 
Analysis of Objective IV
Objective IV
To know the role of government in
combating the problem of global warming
Hypothesis IV
Government does not play any role in
combating the problem of global warming.
In view of the research hypothesis IV,
questions 7, 8 and 9 in the structured questionnaire are sets related questions
that represents data collected meant to analysis the research hypothesis IV as
shown in table 4.4 below
Table 4.4: To knowledge role of
government in combating the problem of global warming
S/N
QUESTIONS
YES
NO
TOTAL
10
Does the government play any role in reducing the effect
of global warming?
84
36
120
11
Is there any need for government to enact laws in controlling
global warming?
100
20
120
12
Does members of the community have any role to play in
reducing global warming in their community
58
62
120
                                   Total
 242
118
360
The total number of respondents that
say “yes” is equal to 242 representing 67.2% while, those that say “no” are
equal to 118 representing 327%. Details in appendix v shows that x2
calculated=3400 while 0.05 table value of x2 at 2df =5.991. Since,
calculated x2 =34.0 it greater than x2 0.05=5.991 at 2df,
the null hypothesis was rejected which means that government have role to play
in combating the problems of global warming.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x