Research
Hypothesis I
Hypothesis I
There
would be no significant relationship between existence and single parenthood in
Oghara community.
would be no significant relationship between existence and single parenthood in
Oghara community.
Items 1, 2, 3
and 4 from the questionnaire were used to analyze the table below
and 4 from the questionnaire were used to analyze the table below
Table 4.2b: Summary of responses on research
question I, items 1 – 4
question I, items 1 – 4
Item
|
A
|
SA
|
D
|
SD
|
Cal. x2 Value
|
Critical Value
|
1
|
73 (45.5)
|
27(47.75)
|
14(16.75)
|
6(10)
|
106.5
|
16.92
|
2
|
54 (45.5)
|
60(47.75)
|
2(16.75)
|
4(10)
|
||
3
|
12 (45.5)
|
66(47.75)
|
21(16.75)
|
21(10)
|
||
4
|
43 (45.5)
|
38(47.75)
|
30(16.75)
|
9(10)
|
x2 = 106.5, table value is 16.92, at 9df
Decision Rule
The calculated chi-square x2 = 106.5 and
table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of significance (see appendix II for
computation). Since the calculated x2 value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no significant relationship between
existence and single parenthood in Oghara community was rejected
while the alternative research hypothesis which states that there is significant relationship between existence
and single parenthood in Oghara community was accepted.
table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of significance (see appendix II for
computation). Since the calculated x2 value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no significant relationship between
existence and single parenthood in Oghara community was rejected
while the alternative research hypothesis which states that there is significant relationship between existence
and single parenthood in Oghara community was accepted.
Research Hypothesis II
There would
be no significant difference between causes and single parenthood in Oghara
community.
be no significant difference between causes and single parenthood in Oghara
community.
Items 5, 6, 7
and 8 from the questionnaire were used to analyze the table below
and 8 from the questionnaire were used to analyze the table below
Table 4.3b: Summary of responses on research
question II, items 5 – 8
question II, items 5 – 8
Item
|
A
|
SA
|
D
|
SD
|
Cal. x2 Value
|
Critical Value
|
5
|
63(44)
|
21(41.25)
|
24(18.25)
|
10(16.5)
|
75.7
|
16.92
|
6
|
51(44)
|
51(41.25)
|
5(18.25)
|
13(16.5)
|
||
7
|
14(44)
|
62(41.25)
|
19(18.25)
|
25(16.5)
|
||
8
|
48(44)
|
31(41.25)
|
41(18.25)
|
16(16.5)
|
x2 = 75.7 table value is 16.92 at 9df
Decision Rule
The calculated chi-square x2 = 75.7 and
table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of significance (see appendix III for
computation). Since the calculated x2 value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no significant difference between
causes and single parenthood in Oghara community was rejected while the alternative research
hypothesis which states that there is significant difference between causes and single parenthood in
Oghara community was accepted.
table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of significance (see appendix III for
computation). Since the calculated x2 value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no significant difference between
causes and single parenthood in Oghara community was rejected while the alternative research
hypothesis which states that there is significant difference between causes and single parenthood in
Oghara community was accepted.
Research
hypothesis III
hypothesis III
There would be no challenges faced by single
parents in Oghara community in the upbringing of their children.
parents in Oghara community in the upbringing of their children.
Items 9, 10, 11 and 12 from the questionnaire were
used to analyze the table below
used to analyze the table below
Table 4.4b: Summary of responses on research question III, items 9 – 12
Item
|
A
|
SA
|
D
|
SD
|
Cal. x2 Value
|
Critical Value
|
9
|
70(44.75)
|
11(34.25)
|
17(17.5)
|
22(23.5)
|
76.4
|
16.92
|
10
|
43(44.75)
|
45(34.25)
|
13(17.5)
|
19(23.5)
|
||
11
|
16(44.75)
|
57(34.25)
|
17(17.5)
|
30(23.5)
|
||
12
|
50(44.75)
|
24(34.25)
|
23(17.5)
|
23(23.5)
|
X2 =76.4, table value is 16.92, at 9df
Decision Rule
The calculated chi-square x2 = 76.4 and
table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of significance (see appendix IV for
computation). Since the calculated x2 value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no challenges faced by single
parents in Oghara community in the upbringing of their children was rejected while the alternative research
hypothesis which states that there are significant challenges faced by single parents in Oghara
community in the upbringing of their children was accepted.
table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of significance (see appendix IV for
computation). Since the calculated x2 value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no challenges faced by single
parents in Oghara community in the upbringing of their children was rejected while the alternative research
hypothesis which states that there are significant challenges faced by single parents in Oghara
community in the upbringing of their children was accepted.
Research hypothesis IV
There
would be no significant remedies to the challenges faced by single parents in
the upbringing of their children in Oghara community.
would be no significant remedies to the challenges faced by single parents in
the upbringing of their children in Oghara community.
Items 13, 14
15 and 16 from the questionnaire were used to analyze the table below
15 and 16 from the questionnaire were used to analyze the table below
Table 4.4: Summary of respondent on research
question IV, items 13 – 16
question IV, items 13 – 16
Item
|
A
|
SA
|
D
|
SD
|
Cal. x2 Value
|
Critical Value
|
13
|
60(41)
|
16(43)
|
27(13.75)
|
17(22.25)
|
79.7
|
16.92
|
14
|
38(41)
|
55(43)
|
8(13.75)
|
19(22.25)
|
||
15
|
21(41)
|
67(43)
|
12(13.75)
|
20(22.25)
|
||
16
|
45(41)
|
34(43)
|
8(13.75)
|
33(22.25)
|
x2 = 79.7, table value is 16.92, at 9df
Decision Rule
The calculated
chi-square x2 = 79.7 and table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of
significance (see appendix V for computation). Since the calculated x2
value is greater than the table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no significant remedies to the
challenges faced by single parents in the upbringing of their children in
Oghara community was rejected
while the alternative research hypothesis states that there are significant remedies to the challenges
faced by single parents in the upbringing of their children in Oghara community
was accepted.
chi-square x2 = 79.7 and table value is 16.92 at 0.05 level of
significance (see appendix V for computation). Since the calculated x2
value is greater than the table value, the null hypothesis which states that there would be no significant remedies to the
challenges faced by single parents in the upbringing of their children in
Oghara community was rejected
while the alternative research hypothesis states that there are significant remedies to the challenges
faced by single parents in the upbringing of their children in Oghara community
was accepted.