In today’s ever changing technologically advanced world people rely heavily on communication to interface with friends, relatives and even other individuals in the workplace. Text messaging is one of the most popular methods of communication, with two primary formats: Currently the two famous mobile messaging services are SMS (Short Message Service) and MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service). After using the two for some time and noticing how millions of people use them every day, I have gathered that they have closer but distinct uses and characteristics. This post discussed the differences between SMS and MMS as a way of helping the readers to make informed decisions regarding the kind of communication they need.
SMS Defined
What is sms messaging? SMS, or Short Messaging Service, is the most basic type of text messaging service that is offered on most mobile phones. It enables people to exchange brief written messages, and these are commonly restricted to 160 characters only. Its main advantage is that the platform is unsophisticated, very dependable, and does not demand the use of the internet, which is scarce in weak internet network areas.
However, it should be noted that like with most simple concepts, there are various disadvantages to implementing SMS. With the character limit set, there can be a limit in sharing any information and as for the multimedia, it is not supported on the SMS platform whatsoever. This makes it best suited for brief text only communication highly recommended for short Messages only.
MMS Defined
What is mms messaging? MMS, or Multimedia Messaging Service, is an extension of SMS (Short Messaging Service) that allows you to send and receive multimedia content like pictures, videos, audio files, and longer text messages. Unlike traditional SMS, which is limited to text-based messages, MMS offers a more versatile and engaging communication method. Think of MMS as a more advanced version of SMS that combines the benefits of both text messaging and file sharing.
However, it requires a mobile data connection, and compared to that of SMS, it is much more costly to use. That is, it might be argued that it has its disadvantages wherever the use of the MMS is intended for those who have a limited data tariff plan. The messages themselves can be even larger. Second, it should be mentioned that some of the devices do not even support MMS to the full extent.
Cost Differences
It is also important to note here that more often than not, the use of SMS is cheaper than MMS. If you were to compare the time that you send messages to the different people via e-mail, sending a message via an SMS, will cost less and if it is not free then it will anyway be billed under the bundle.
Whereas for MMS it is relatively cheaper compared to normal SMS since it incorporates both text and multimedia information. This puts MMS as a disadvantage to the many users who may have a little bit of money to spend since it costs more and users can end up using more data.
When to Use SMS vs. MMS
All of these can be summed up by the type of message that a person intends to send out. in many cases the determinant is if a person wants to send an SMS OR an MMS. Since it has been established that text messaging is between individuals then the most appropriate way to pass the message is through the medium since it is normally used for short and simple messages like a reminder or update.
MMS is most appropriate to use when you want to share images, videos or when you want to give out long details. For instance, under the concept of MMS, it is possible to forward a photo of a specific product or even record a video and convey greeting to the near and dear ones. MMS can also be quite useful albeit to some extent, such as when someone wants to relay detailed information or when one wants to develop a message full of graphics.
Compatibility and Device Support
One of the major issues that arise between the two is compatibility as well as in device acceptance factors. Out of all the mobile messaging platforms, probably, the most famous one is SMS, the messaging that is sent to all the types of mobile phones, including the older and the simplest ones. Such possibilities make it easier for people to be able to dispatch and receive SMS irrespective of the type of phone that is being used.
One of the drawbacks of MMS is that it may not be compatible with some of the older used devices or even the network in use at particular places. Some of the phones or the network may support MMS to a certain extent, and it is what brings difficulties in how to send or receive MMS. Additionally, environments in relation to carrier and device may offer partial support for some or all of the encoded MMS features that in return may inhibit appearance of the message upon receipt or prolong its delivery.
Conclusion
As mentioned earlier both SMS and MMS are very important in mobile communication though they are very unique in their own way. As the following analysis will reveal, it is completely unambiguous; it is reliable; and, by the standards of the majority of international brands, it is cheap when the message is purely text. While it is cheaper than MMS, SMS is also a less media rich communications application relative to MMS which costs more to use. However, it supports the sending of multimedia content. Understanding these differences will help you choose the appropriate communication channel for your needs.
Photo Credit: Heymarket