Analysis
objective I
objective I
To determine the causes of poor refuse
management
management
Research
hypothesis I
hypothesis I
Ho: There are no causes of poor refuse
management in Uguno Orogun Community
management in Uguno Orogun Community
Ha: There are causes of poor refuse
management in Uguno Orogun Community
management in Uguno Orogun Community
Questions 1, 2 and 3 in the
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.1 below
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.1 below
Table
4.1: Summary of the respondents view on the cause of poor refuse management in
Orogun Community
4.1: Summary of the respondents view on the cause of poor refuse management in
Orogun Community
|
S/N
|
QUESTION
|
YES
|
NO
|
TOTAL
|
|
1.
|
Does lack of funds result to poor
refuse management? |
261
|
39
|
300
|
|
2.
|
Does lack of equipment result to
poor refuse management? |
280
|
20
|
300
|
|
3.
|
Does lack of dumping site result
to poor refuse management? |
245
|
55
|
300
|
|
TOTAL
|
786
|
114
|
900
|
|
The total respondents that said “Yes”
to the related question is 786 (87.3) while those that said “No” is 114
(12.7%). The calculated chi-square X2 value is 22.33 while the table
value X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991. therefore, since the calculates X2
value of 22.33 is ≥ the table value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher
rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there are causes of poor refuse
management in Orogun Community. (see appendix II for detail)
to the related question is 786 (87.3) while those that said “No” is 114
(12.7%). The calculated chi-square X2 value is 22.33 while the table
value X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991. therefore, since the calculates X2
value of 22.33 is ≥ the table value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher
rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there are causes of poor refuse
management in Orogun Community. (see appendix II for detail)
Analysis
of objective II
of objective II
To ascertain the effects of poor refuse
management to health in Uguno Orogun Community
management to health in Uguno Orogun Community
Research
hypothesis II
hypothesis II
Ho: There are no implication of poor
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun Community
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun Community
Ha: There are implication of poor
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun Community
refuse management on human in Uguno Orogun Community
Questions 4, 5 and 6 in the
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.2 below
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.2 below
Table
4.2: Summary of the respondents view on the implication of poor refuse
management on human in Uguno Orogun Community.
4.2: Summary of the respondents view on the implication of poor refuse
management on human in Uguno Orogun Community.
|
S/N
|
QUESTION
|
YES
|
NO
|
TOTAL
|
|
4.
|
Are there any hazards associated
with refuse management? |
252
|
48
|
300
|
|
5.
|
Does poor refuse management result
to airborne diseases? |
270
|
30
|
300
|
|
6.
|
Does poor refuse management result
to disease transmission? |
259
|
41
|
300
|
|
TOTAL
|
781
|
119
|
900
|
|
The
total respondents that said “Yes” to the related question is 781 (86.6%) while
those that said “No” is 119 (13.2%). The calculated chi-square X2
value is 11.26 while the table value X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991.
therefore, since the calculates X2 value of 11.26 is ≥ the table
value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher rejected the null hypothesis and
concluded that there are implication of poor refuse management on human in Uguno
Orogun Community. (see appendix III for detail)
total respondents that said “Yes” to the related question is 781 (86.6%) while
those that said “No” is 119 (13.2%). The calculated chi-square X2
value is 11.26 while the table value X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991.
therefore, since the calculates X2 value of 11.26 is ≥ the table
value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher rejected the null hypothesis and
concluded that there are implication of poor refuse management on human in Uguno
Orogun Community. (see appendix III for detail)
Analysis
of objective III
of objective III
To find out the implication of poor
refuse management on the environment in Uguno Orogun Community
refuse management on the environment in Uguno Orogun Community
Research
hypothesis III
hypothesis III
Ho: There are no environmental implication
of poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
of poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
Ha: There are environmental implication
of poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
of poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
Questions 7, 8 and 9 in the
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.3 below
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.3 below
Table
4.3: Summary of the respondents view on the environmental implication of poor
refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community.
4.3: Summary of the respondents view on the environmental implication of poor
refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community.
|
S/N
|
QUESTION
|
YES
|
NO
|
TOTAL
|
|
7.
|
Are there any fire outbreaks as a
result of accumulation of refuse? |
280
|
20
|
300
|
|
8.
|
Does poor refuse
disposal/management cause flooding? |
239
|
61
|
300
|
|
9.
|
Does poor refuse management result
to air pollution? |
201
|
99
|
300
|
|
TOTAL
|
720
|
180
|
900
|
|
The total respondents that said
“Yes” to the related question is 720 (80%) while those that said “No” is 180
(20%). The calculated chi-square X2 value is 69.22 while the table value
X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991. therefore, since the calculates X2
value of 69.22 is ≥ the table value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher
rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there are environmental implication
of poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community. (see appendix IV for
detail)
“Yes” to the related question is 720 (80%) while those that said “No” is 180
(20%). The calculated chi-square X2 value is 69.22 while the table value
X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991. therefore, since the calculates X2
value of 69.22 is ≥ the table value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher
rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there are environmental implication
of poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community. (see appendix IV for
detail)
Analysis
of objective IV
of objective IV
To find out the various ways of
improving poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
improving poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
Research
hypothesis IV
hypothesis IV
Ho: There are no various ways of
improving poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
improving poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
Ha: There are various ways of improving
poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
poor refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
Questions 10, 11 and 12 in the
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.4 below
questionnaire are related question that were used for the treatment of the
above stated research hypothesis as shown in table 4.4 below
Table
4.4: Summary of the respondents view on the various ways of improving poor
refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
4.4: Summary of the respondents view on the various ways of improving poor
refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community
|
S/N
|
QUESTION
|
YES
|
NO
|
TOTAL
|
|
10.
|
Does provision of dumpsite help to
improve refuse management? |
285
|
15
|
300
|
|
11.
|
Does provision of manpower help to
improve waste management? |
270
|
30
|
300
|
|
12.
|
Does provision of equipment
improve refuse management? |
253
|
47
|
300
|
|
TOTAL
|
808
|
92
|
900
|
|
The total respondents that said
“Yes” to the related question is 808 (89.8%) while those that said “No” is 92
(10.2%). The calculated chi-square X2 value is 19.02 while the table
value X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991. therefore, since the calculates X2
value of 19.02 is ≥ the table value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher
rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there are ways of improving poor
refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community.
“Yes” to the related question is 808 (89.8%) while those that said “No” is 92
(10.2%). The calculated chi-square X2 value is 19.02 while the table
value X2 at 0.05 at 2df = 5.991. therefore, since the calculates X2
value of 19.02 is ≥ the table value of X2 = 5.991, the researcher
rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that there are ways of improving poor
refuse management in Uguno Orogun Community.